As he did not believe human beings were apeshe believed this might have been during the Cretaceouscontrary to what is possible given the geologic and evolutionary biology evidence available at the time. On the advice of his colleagues, Hardy delayed presenting the hypothesis for approximately thirty years.
Posted on March 3, by Scott Alexander I have heard the following from a bunch of people, one of whom was me six months ago: They seem to be saying things that are either morally repugnant or utterly ridiculous. And just as well try to give a quick summary of the sweeping elegaic paeans to a bygone age of high culture and noble virtues that is Reaction.
But there is some content, and some of it is disconcerting.
I started reading a little about Reaction after incessantly being sent links to various Mencius Moldbug posts, and then started hanging out in an IRC channel with a few Reactionaries including the infamous Konkvistador whom I could question about it.
Obviously this makes me the world expert who is completely qualified to embark on the hitherto unattempted project of explaining it to everyone else. Trying to sum up their ideas seems like a good way to first of all get a reference point for what their ideas are, and second of all to make it clearer why I think they deserve a rebuttal.
I have tried to be charitable towards these ideas, which means this post will be pushing politically incorrect and offensive positions. If you do not want to read it, especially the middle parts which are about race, I would totally understand that.
But if you do read it and accuse me of holding these ideas myself and get really angry, then you fail at reading comprehension forever.
I originally planned to follow this up tomorrow with the post containing my arguments against these positions, but this argument took longer than I thought to write and I expect the counterargument will as well. Expect a post critiquing reactionary ideas sometime in the next…week?
This is the post where I argue that modern society is rotten to the core, and that the only reasonable solution is to dig up King James II, clone him, and give the clone absolute control over everything.
The imperial Chinese thought nothing could beat imperial China, the medieval Spaniards thought medieval Spain was a singularly impressive example of perfection, and Communist Soviets were pretty big on Soviet Communism.
Meanwhile, we think 21st-century Western civilization, with its democracy, secularism, and ethnic tolerance is pretty neat. Since the first three examples now seem laughably wrong, we should be suspicious of the hypothesis that we finally live in the one era whose claim to have gotten political philosophy right is totally justified.
Speak out against the Chinese Empire and you lose your head. Speak out against the King of Spain and you face the Inquisition.
Speak out against Comrade Stalin and you get sent to Siberia. The great thing about western liberal democracy is that it has a free marketplace of ideas.
Everybody criticizes some aspect of our society. Noam Chomsky made a career of criticizing our society and became rich and famous and got a cushy professorship.The simplistic definition of the null is as the opposite of the alternative hypothesis, H 1, although the principle is a little more complex than that..
The null hypothesis (H 0) is a hypothesis which the researcher tries to disprove, reject or nullify.. The 'null' often refers to the common view of something, while the alternative hypothesis is what the researcher really thinks is the cause.
There is a staggeringly wide range of answers to the question “what’s the appropriate test statistic for this set of data”–often honestly arrived at, with some level of . The statistical analysis will allow you to reject either the null or the alternative hypothesis.
If the alternative is rejected, then you need to go back and refine the initial hypothesis or design a completely new research program. ch8Bprac SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question.
Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P - value, conclusion about the null hypothesis, and final.
Hypothesis Tests for 1 sample Proportions 1. Hypotheses. Write the null and alternative hypotheses you would use to test each of the following situations.
The null hypothesis (H 0) is a hypothesis which the researcher tries to disprove, reject or nullify. The 'null' often refers to the common view of something, while the alternative hypothesis is what the researcher really thinks is the cause of a phenomenon.
An experiment conclusion always refers to the null, rejecting or accepting H 0 rather than .