Research cloning deliberately creates and destroys human life. Research cloning produces a single-cell human embryo.
Print Having helped block federal legislation that would ban human cloning for therapeutic purposes, the biotechnology industry is lobbying a handful of state legislatures to pass bills that would legalize the controversial techniques.
Should Cloning be banned completely, regulated, or fully legal? When it comes to the topic of cloning, many writers embrace different views on the use of this technology. When it comes to the topic of cloning, many writers embrace different views on the use of this technology. Most Americans and other countries oppose all human cloning. A majority of Americans support a ban on both reproductive and research cloning. Many countries and international organizations, including Germany, Switzerland, the European Parliament, and others, have banned all human cloning. It should not be prohibited but strongly regulated. The most prevalent reason that cloning should not be banned is its medical value. There are already drug and medicine manufactures all over the world who are working on products that can be produced in cows’ milk or even sheep or goats milk when the trait is .
The state bills faithfully duplicate word for word substantial portions of a BIO-backed bill that California adopted two years ago. Critics charge that the legislation is marked by "sloppy language" and ethical ambiguities. It goes on to note that opponents of unregulated cloning technology are battling state efforts to permit cloning human embryos to extract stem cells.
The trade association and its state affiliates have also backed state bills that legalize embryonic stem cell research, permit with some restriction the sale of embryonic and fetal material, and allow researchers to create embryos for the purpose of medical research.
Some of the state bills that BIO is backing outlaw reproductive cloning. However, while they ban researchers from performing human cloning experiments that would result in the birth of a cloned human being, they allow the development of cloning techniques that might lead to new treatments for diseases.
Such experiments are ongoing. The accomplishment in what is called "therapeutic cloning" is hailed in scientific circles as a major breakthrough that will open the door for cell-based therapies.
It is believed that an embryo cloned using a cell from a patient will have genetically identical stem cells that could be grown into replacement tissues, or spare parts, to treat disease. But it also brings human cloning close to reality. The embryos that the Koreans, one of whom was trained in the United States, created through cloning were not implanted—reproductive cloning is illegal in South Korea.
The writer is correct when he indicated that it has been more than twenty years since the birth of first test-tubes was performed, and if that particular artificial child was accepted in society, why can’t clones be? Reproductive cloning, or the cloning of embryos for the purpose of implantation. Nearly all politicians agree that reproductive cloning should be banned, but there is an ongoing debate over the legal status of therapeutic cloning. Jul 09, · Only then, with empirical evidence in hand, should we consider the pro's and con's of human cloning or, for that matter, any other form of nuclei transfer. A human clone is not a "delayed" twin. Totally different initiativeblog.com: Resolved.
But in the United States, there is no federal law or regulations governing such research. Congress has been pursuing legislative measures to regulate the cloning research for more than six years.
Sincesome 44 bills have been introduced in the House of Representatives and Senate seeking to ban or regulate cloning research. But despite such seemingly feverish legislative actions, congressional efforts failed because of the differences over whether to allow cloning for research purposes.
While there is an overwhelming consensus among members of Congress to prohibit reproductive cloning, or the creation of a genetically identical human being, lawmakers are almost evenly split on whether to allow the less controversial therapeutic cloning research, leading to a legislative stalemate.
State legislatures have entered the breach. Over the past two years state legislatures have considered nearly bills on the cloning issue. Eight states have enacted laws addressing issues related to human cloning, and many more have embryonic and fetal research regulations, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures, a non-profit organization that tracks legislative activities in states.
The biotechnology industry has been tracking that activity as well. Playing one state off another States with a large biotech presence have moved toward legalizing the therapeutic cloning and stem cell research.
The legislation was preceded by an executive order by President Bush in that limited the federal funding of stem cells to a few cell lines. The study warned that, "Competition for biotech jobs is getting tougher as rival states such as California and North Carolina, often with strong state-government support, organize to attract companies and jobs.
State regulatory agencies should review and reevaluate existing regulations for appropriateness. In New Jersey, home to more than biotech companies, legislators copied more than the preamble from the California law.
But Garden State legislators crafted a bill that was friendlier to the biotech industry than the one on which it was based. Jim McGreevey signed into law a controversial bill that authorized "research involving the derivation and use of human embryonic stem cells, human embryonic germ cells and human adult stem cells, including somatic cell nuclear transplantation.
The New Jersey bill permits the sale of embryonic and fetal material to researchers for "reasonable payment. When the bill reached the General Assembly, however, it ran into heavy opposition. Thompson, criticized the "undue haste in releasing the bill without taking time to give full consideration to the practical and ethical questions.
Reeve testified in favor of the legislation and was present at the signing ceremony.
New Jersey also has some state-of-the-art hospitals and universities that conduct stem cell research. Other backers of legislation included University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey and Saint Barnabas Medical Center, a top health care provider and the place where the first mammal was cloned from embryos.
David Beck, president and chief executive officer of the Coriell Institute for Medical Research, a New Jersey-based, non-profit biomedical research institution, testified on behalf of the bill three times. Leading the lobbying efforts for the industry was Biotechnology Council of New Jersey, a BIO affiliate which represents more than a hundred biotech companies.
They hired one of their member firms, Princeton Public Affairs Group, the top lobbying firm in the state, which boasts Dale J. Florio, a former adviser to then-Gov. Christine Todd Whitman, John F. BIO itself pushed for passage of the measure.
Werner raised the specter of competition from other states to pressure New Jersey legislators.The writer is correct when he indicated that it has been more than twenty years since the birth of first test-tubes was performed, and if that particular artificial child was accepted in society, why can’t clones be?
Yes, cloning should be regulated by the government. The government has the right to put an end to research being done by certain doctors who are trying to accomplish making clones.
Cloning research should be stopped because it is also unsafe. it comes with a lot of harms. Reproductive cloning, or the cloning of embryos for the purpose of implantation. Nearly all politicians agree that reproductive cloning should be banned, but there is an ongoing debate over the legal status of therapeutic cloning.
Essay Cloning Should Be Regulated By A Moral Compass no objection to cloning as such as a technological instrument for medical and therapeutic purposes. As in all these cases, what must govern one 's decisions is the question of compassionate motivation.
Reproductive cloning, or the cloning of embryos for the purpose of implantation. Nearly all politicians agree that reproductive cloning should be banned, but there is an ongoing debate over the legal status of therapeutic cloning.
Human Cloning Should Be Legal Essays: Over , Human Cloning Should Be Legal Essays, Human Cloning Should Be Legal Term Papers, Human Cloning Should Be Legal Research Paper, Book Reports.
ESSAYS, term and research papers available for UNLIMITED access.