Explanation Example A topic sentence tells the examiner what the rest of the paragraph is about. In other words, it is a summary of your first idea.
Or are you a good enough writer to create your own structure on the fly? I've had high-scoring writers really benefit from using a template for the GRE issue essay.
Others, of course, scoff at the idea because they're such good writers. Either way, first of all, high scorers should follow the advice that everyone should follow, just to get as used to the task as possible: These are great models for your writing since you can see what the ETS graders reward.
Pay very close attention to the grader commentary. Read and brainstorm the topics for the Issue essay and the topics for the Argument essay. Write essays untimed, then timed. Compare them to the sample essays in the ETS books.
I highly recommend getting a good writer to look at your essays. They Say, I Say is the best book I know of to improve your writing.
The example and response I want to use first is this one about technology link is to the GRE's website. Go ahead and read the prompt, then read the "6" response just below it.
Now, let's think about its statement: As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Good responses will acknowledge the complexity of the issue and respond in an insightful way to that complexity. This response does that partly by discussing the reasoning that might be used by someone who agrees with the statement in paragraph 2: The statement attempts to bridge these dramatic changes to a reduction in the ability for humans to think for themselves.
The assumption is that an increased reliance on technology negates the need for people to think creatively to solve previous quandaries. Looking back at the introduction, one could argue that without a car, computer, or mobile phone, the hypothetical worker would need to find alternate methods of transport, information processing and communication.
Technology short circuits this thinking by making the problems obsolete. Good writers often begin this way - they talk about their opponents' views, then respond with their own.
This provides context and a framework for their argument.
Writing a persuasive essay without addressing the reasoning of other points-of-view is like pretending your point-of-view exists in a vacuum with no one to challenge it.Evolutionary scientists sometimes say the most fascinating things. When confronting creationists, they always present a unified front, insisting that total evolution is a certain fact of science, proved beyond reasonable doubt.
Rogerian argument is especially dependent on audience analysis because the writer must present the reader's perspective clearly, accurately, and fairly. If you want to read more about Rogerian argument, Kate Kiefer has additional explanations and sample texts available in Eddy. Write an extended summary of Renstrom’s essay (“they say”) as well as your response to the arguments made (“I say”).
For this essay, I would like you to spend more time picking apart and understanding the author’s argument than on asserting your own opinion. Compare the first paragraph from the early draft and first paragraph from the final draft of the essay.
What are the differences? They Say/I say p at Furman University. Disregarding for the moment what Poe says, focus your attention on the phrases Poe uses to structure what she says (italicized here).
Then write a new paragraph. Since some of my students are consistently pwning the They Say / I Say template, I want to introduce them to a list of templates and transitions to use within the structure of a two-paragraph They Say / I Say . What is happening in the text when they say it? 2. This prepares the reader for the quote by introducing the speaker, setting, and/or situation.
iii. Quote/Concrete details - a specific example from the work used to Outline Structure for Literary Analysis Essay Author.